<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pictures Of The Year International (Five Photos)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687</link>
	<description>A daily selection by the editors of Photo District News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:09:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: idv82</title>
		<link>http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687/comment-page-1#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>idv82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/?p=1687#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>These are the pictures of the year? You got to be kidding! To quote Bart Simpson: BOOORING!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are the pictures of the year? You got to be kidding! To quote Bart Simpson: BOOORING!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Driftwood</title>
		<link>http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687/comment-page-1#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Driftwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/?p=1687#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>Dark skined :-) like it, the term is black as I&#039;m constantly told by black people I fail to address as anything other then black. Anyway the poster is correct, if it&#039;s a photo comp then surely you should choose a wide range of situations not just &quot;poor black or opressed black people&quot; It&#039;s a very big world you know. I bet Norway, Spain and even the rich people of India take a nice photo.

I wouldn&#039;t vote for any of these, they lack invention, pick almost any magazine up from the 60s and 70s and you&#039;ll see the same images trying to pull on heart strings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dark skined :-) like it, the term is black as I&#8217;m constantly told by black people I fail to address as anything other then black. Anyway the poster is correct, if it&#8217;s a photo comp then surely you should choose a wide range of situations not just &#8220;poor black or opressed black people&#8221; It&#8217;s a very big world you know. I bet Norway, Spain and even the rich people of India take a nice photo.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t vote for any of these, they lack invention, pick almost any magazine up from the 60s and 70s and you&#8217;ll see the same images trying to pull on heart strings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Television Spy</title>
		<link>http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687/comment-page-1#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Television Spy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/?p=1687#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Nice pics especially the last one. I really prefer photos that don&#039;t play the &quot;developing country trife&quot;. Far overdone, rather than showing povery and corruption in the world, why not show joy and elation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice pics especially the last one. I really prefer photos that don&#8217;t play the &#8220;developing country trife&#8221;. Far overdone, rather than showing povery and corruption in the world, why not show joy and elation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: letitride2</title>
		<link>http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687/comment-page-1#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>letitride2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/?p=1687#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>Paul I agree something isnt right. The barbed wire and placement of both feet don&#039;t make sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul I agree something isnt right. The barbed wire and placement of both feet don&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B..</title>
		<link>http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687/comment-page-1#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>B..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/?p=1687#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>Paul, I see what you&#039;re seeing.  But I grabbed the rendition and looked for other weird artifacts of post-processing.  The only things I could find looked as though the unsharp filter was inexpertly applied.  If this is something that&#039;s placed in another shot, the edges of the inset should show artifacts when zoomed way in.  I don&#039;t see those artifacts.  It *may* be, but I consider it not likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I see what you&#8217;re seeing.  But I grabbed the rendition and looked for other weird artifacts of post-processing.  The only things I could find looked as though the unsharp filter was inexpertly applied.  If this is something that&#8217;s placed in another shot, the edges of the inset should show artifacts when zoomed way in.  I don&#8217;t see those artifacts.  It *may* be, but I consider it not likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687/comment-page-1#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/?p=1687#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>Why can the good parts of various Countries be portrayed ? Afterall, there are better places to take snaps of. Focus on i.e. Wheat farms , or cotton, or petroleum from  these countries. Look at the positives of a Country not Negative. I should say developed Countries gain i.e. Technologically from developing countries. Hence enable your optimistic eye next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can the good parts of various Countries be portrayed ? Afterall, there are better places to take snaps of. Focus on i.e. Wheat farms , or cotton, or petroleum from  these countries. Look at the positives of a Country not Negative. I should say developed Countries gain i.e. Technologically from developing countries. Hence enable your optimistic eye next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687/comment-page-1#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>John thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/?p=1687#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>Wow, most amazing images dude!

RT
www.privacy.cz.tc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, most amazing images dude!</p>
<p>RT<br />
<a href="http://www.privacy.cz.tc" rel="nofollow">http://www.privacy.cz.tc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/07/1687/comment-page-1#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/?p=1687#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>I agree with anna. The pictures just make it because they&#039;re of troubled conditions, not outstanding photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with anna. The pictures just make it because they&#8217;re of troubled conditions, not outstanding photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
